DJP / Manufacturer research 03 / Comparison / engineering
Two Daisies.
The silhouette looks familiar. The interface doesn't.
Daisy 2.0 and Daisy Plus share strikingly similar manufacturer-published external dimensions. Yet one is presented with a built-in system and the other with a newer removable-sleeve arrangement. Treat them as different product variants, not alternative labels on the same listing.
An independent evidence-based comparison, not a physical teardown. Values and interface statements below are manufacturer-published as captured in September 2026; exact availability and revisions can change.
The essential difference
Daisy 2.0 is TANTALY’s current fixed/built-in internal-system presentation. Daisy Plus belongs to its later removable architecture and is advertised to accept a widely used sleeve size. The names share a family, but their construction and replacement-part requirements are not interchangeable by assumption.
Two manufacturer product pages, rather than a reseller’s generalized “3.0” title, form the comparison basis. TANTALY’s own lineage statements also distinguish legacy Daisy, the first-generation Pro removable branch and the newer Plus removable series.
Side-by-side manufacturer specification table
| Feature | Daisy 2.0 | Daisy Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer net weight | 17.62 kg | 18.4 kg |
| Manufacturer gross weight | 21.84 kg | 21.8 kg |
| Internal system | Built-in/fixed (manufacturer presentation) | Removable sleeve / Tantaremoval (manufacturer presentation) |
| Skeleton description | Do not infer Plus articulation from matching outer dimensions | Manufacturer describes built-in high-flexibility skeleton |
| Lying maximum height | 26 cm | 26 cm |
| Sitting height | 30 cm | 30 cm |
| Waist circumference | 61.5 cm | 61.5 cm |
| Hip circumference | 114 cm | 114 cm |
| Hip width | 50.5 cm | 50.5 cm |
| Published LHP | 3 cm | 3.5 cm |
| Published vaginal length | 15.5 cm | 16 cm |
| Published anal length | 13.5 cm | 14 cm |
| Replacement/interface note | Do not assume removable-component support | Maker describes approx. 8.7 × 3.1 in standard-sleeve format; verify exact accessory |
The first-party table shows why exterior measurements alone cannot safely identify one internal mold or guarantee that two accessories will fit. Even where the outside values match, the interface and published internal measurements diverge. These numbers remain manufacturer specifications, not DJP measurements.
The most expensive mistake is assuming cross-compatibility
TANTALY’s Daisy Plus documentation uses Tantaremoval language while describing a newer sleeve system. Importantly, the maker says the Plus removable structure is not compatible with other Tantaremoval removable vaginas. The broadly advertised sleeve dimensions are a selection clue, not proof that every third-party sleeve fits securely or safely.
Legacy first-generation Pro products and the later Plus design must remain separate in any DJP replacement/accessory finder. Confirm the exact product generation, sleeve geometry and current approved replacements rather than searching only “TANTALY removable.”
Similar packaging is not evidence of identical hardware
The official Daisy 2.0 page reports that the older Daisy name may still appear on packaging after the move to Daisy 2.0. The official Daisy Plus page similarly says the Plus product can ship with Daisy outer packaging.
That means a box marked “Daisy” can correspond to more than one actual current variant. For identification, compare the confirmed ordered listing, maker description, physical fixed/removable interface, purchase date and any verifiable code rather than treating the box label as a definitive model ID.
What about Daisy Pro and seller “3.0” pages?
The manufacturer’s current removable-options guide places Pro in the earlier Tantaremoval generation and Plus in a later one. Manufacturer material describes the first-generation products, including Kylie, as discontinued in August 2026. That chronology does not prove Daisy Pro and Daisy Plus are literally the same mold with new internals.
Various dealers may publish “3.0” labels or Q-code aliases. DJP’s corpus has not established a single universal manufacturer generation behind every such label. Keep source-local code, date and product identity attached rather than inventing a harmonized version number.
Which Daisy suits which priorities?
Choose a product by its current documented internal system. A reader who wants a built-in configuration will investigate Daisy 2.0; a reader specifically interested in replacing or removing the relevant component will investigate Daisy Plus, after verifying the exact compatible format. Neither is automatically superior in softness, durability or satisfaction on the evidence currently available.
Weight changes are small compared with the interface distinction: published net mass differs by 0.78 kg. The actual carrying and storage burden is substantial in either case; use our weight and handling guide when planning a location or support surface.
Buying and source verification
Compare the current official Daisy 2.0 product page with the separate official Daisy Plus listing. When buying from another channel, confirm which manufacturer version the dealer is actually quoting and what their own return/support policy covers. No live inventory, real-time price, independently tested accessory compatibility or owner review is implied.